Go Back   StriperSurf Forums > Regional Fishing Forums > Fishing - New Jersey

Fishing - New Jersey New Jersey Fishing Reports and Information covering Sandy Hook south to Cape May

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2014, 11:57 PM
Angler Paul Angler Paul is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 149
Default New Striper Regs? JCAA Position?

New Striper Regs? JCAA Position?

Ok, by now many of you have read the new striper addendum and formulated your own opinions on it. I have read an awful lot of comments on the internet, yet relatively few people have come to the hearings we had in New Jersey thus far. Worse yet the vast majority of people just sit there and listen but do not voice their opinions during the comment period. Hopefully, all concerned parties will at least write letters or send emails prior to the 9/30 deadline.
I have also read a number of comments where people have bashed Tom Fote because he favors status quo and does not believe stricter regulations are needed at this time. Tom is one of our state's three representatives on the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Council. Other states from North Carolina to Maine are represented on this council as well. Each state has only one vote so our three representatives will have to reach a consensus prior to voting. The ASMFC is expected to vote on the addendum at their October meeting. As a commissioner,
Tom represents all the fishermen of our state, both commercial and recreational. He does not represent the Jersey Coast Anglers Association, the Berkeley Striper Club, the Fish Hawks or any of the other clubs he belongs to at the ASMFC meetings. He does his best to be impartial and fair to all of our fishermen while he does what he feels is best for our various fishery resources.
Tom has been taking a lot of heat for his stance on opposing reducing the mortality on stripers but be advised that Tom has been an avid striper fishermen for many years and has been involved in fisheries management since the 1970's. He has some very valid reasons such as the fact that the stock has not been over fished and over fishing is not occurring. Please remember that without Tom Fote, we would not have achieved game fish or no-sale status for striped bass in our state. We owe a lot of thanks to Tom for all he has done for us.
That having been said, I am the president of the JCAA and I disagree with him on this issue. I too have been an avid striper fishermen for over 40 years and in my prime fished close to 100 nights a year for them on the jetties. I fished for them when there were very few stripers around during the moratorium years as well as the more recent years of peak abundance. For the record I favor option B to the addendum which would result in a 25% reduction in mortality within one year and more specifically I favor 1 fish at 32" because it will best protect the 2011 year class, allowing them to spawn a couple times before they are harvested. I have a number of other valid reasons for supporting this option as well.
As far as JCAA is concerned neither one of us represent the JCAA position on this matter. JCAA is composed of approximately 75 member clubs that each have one vote. Each club may send a representative or two to our monthly general membership meetings and may make a motion asking that JCAA adopt stance on a particular subject such as the striper addendum. Often club reps then inform their respective clubs of the motion and they formulate their own position on it. The rep then votes as directed by his club at the next JCAA meeting. If the motion passes it becomes the official position of the JCAA.
Since JCAA had no summer meeting, I scheduled a special meeting on 9/3. I urged all clubs to attend with hope that we could reach a consensus on the striper addendum. Unfortunately, many of our clubs had not yet formulated their positions and those that did were pretty much evenly divided between the various options. Therefore JCAA has no official position on the addendum except for one area. Our member clubs unanimously support option A of section 3.1 which is status quo - no transfer of commercial quota. Option B would allow a state such as North Carolina where there have been no stripers in recent years to transfer its quota to a state such as Maryland or Virginia. This would allow the bass to be harvested rather than conserved. In an addendum that is virtually all about status quo or a decrease in mortality it is a appalling that the ASMFC would include something like this that would allow more stripers to be killed by commercial fishermen. Regarding the rest of the addendum, JCAA is recommending that all interested clubs and individuals give their opinions via email or mail by the 9/30 deadline and/or attend our state's final hearing on the addendum. The hearing will be on Tuesday, 9/15 from 7-9 PM at the Toms River Town Hall, L.M. Hirshblond Room located at 33 Washington St. in Toms River. Those wishing to summit written comments may mail them to Mike Waine, Fishery Management Plan coordinator, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1050 North Highland St., Suite 200 A-N, Arlington, Va. 220201 or email them to him at mwaine@asmfc.org.

Paul Haertel
President, JCAA
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 06:57 AM
RobS's Avatar
RobS RobS is online now
SS / Curmudgeon / SSc Storm Watcher
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: living near the least productive waters of the NE
Posts: 18,130
Default Re: New Striper Regs? JCAA Position?

Paul, why is it in this day and age, with all NJ anglers from whom you'd wish to get input registered with an email address, by law, that NO ONE BOTHERS TO POLL ANGLERS FOR THEIR INPUT?

The ASMFC could get input from every registered NJ angler very easily by getting a high school student to help them get an email poll setup and get input.

Do you realize that the main reason anglers don't give their "input" is because of the perception of where that "input" goes?

(and note this rant is not directed at you, Paul.... thanks for putting this info up at all here at SSC... but)

We do a mandatory employee sat survey every year, it's sent out, there are poll results tracking how many responses are received, and then the data is weighed.

This is the 21st century and if the ASMFC wants input, then there are relatively easy ways to get it. If you want to know what anglers think, and not just go by club votes, you can get it.
-- Rob Switzer
~~~~~ ><((((?> ~~~~~
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 09:10 AM
Angler Paul Angler Paul is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 149
Default Re: New Striper Regs? JCAA Position?

The meeting is tonight, Monday 9/15, not Tuesday 9/15.
Rob, I agree it would be nice to have polls on line but don't know how to get the powers to be to do it at this time.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book Talk: Fly Fishing the Striper Surf Frank Daignault Ask Frank Daignault 120 02-11-2018 01:57 PM
New JCAA Fluke Director Position Open Angler Paul Fishing - New Jersey 0 10-19-2011 08:11 PM
Maryland Striper Regs Stan Creighton Ask Frank Daignault 7 04-26-2007 11:46 AM
Pending fluke regs. cont. Angler Paul Fishing - New Jersey 12 02-09-2007 05:41 PM
Meeting on new striper regs Tight Penny MAIN FORUM 5 05-26-2004 10:03 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2016 StriperSurf.com, All Rights Reserved